Wednesday, June 9, 2021

                                           REVISED WEEK 5 RESULTS

 

  Unfortunately, it is necessary to revise Week 5 results due to the disqualification of two A players in the same playing group for playing All White tees, when this is clearly prohibited for A or B players. Ignorance of this rule is no excuse. 

 It is clear to every group in the league, with the apparent exception of this group, that the purpose of offering All White tees is to help the lesser skilled players to be more involved "in the game" and increasing their chances of winning cash prizes, etc. It obviously is not intended for a 14-quota golfer to have tap-in eagles. 

  The players' defense was that they just started All Whites on Week 5 (one of the players didn't start the season until Week 5) because they thought that any golfer could play any tee at any time. However, the rules on tees have been thoroughly stated in e-mails and blog entries from before the season even started, so there is no excuse for not being aware of them.      

  As the result of them playing the White tee on 9, one of these players eagled the hole with a 1-foot eagle tap in. This obviously would not have happened if he had played the correct Blue tee on 9.  This 8 point eagle, and 22 total points resulted in cash winnings of $100 from CTP, a skin, 1st Ind., and 2nd Team. This player's Week 5 card has been thrown out. The other A player improperly played the 10th hole from the Whites and got a birdie skin. This player's Week 5 card has also been thrown out.

   After voiding the scores of the disqualified players, Week 5 Results have been refigured with the legitimate winners. Most of the legit winners had already won some money but have now been bumped up after the DQ scores were thrown out. The column that reads "due" is the additional amount owed to each golfer and there will be envelopes in the box next week.

    The disqualified players will return their winnings by dropping off $100 (eagle man) and $50 from the B(ogus)9 skins win in envelopes and placed in the SIGL box at the bar next Tuesday. The two players have also been disqualified for Week 6.   

    Failure to promptly pay back the winnings or if there are any other infractions, the players will be expelled.    

           REVISED WEEK 5 RESULTS

                                                                                   prev. pd     due                                             

1ST IND.             MIKE SILVA              +8       $25       $20          $5

2ND                     MIKE WALL              +6         20         15            5

3RD                     PAUL MURPHY         +6         15          0           15

(Original 1st Ind. has been DQed.)


1ST TM  +11       MIKE WALL              +6          25        25            0

                             JOHN TRACY            +5         25         25           0


2ND TM  +8        PAUL MURPHY         +6         20          15          5

                               MIKE BRADLEY        +2         20         15          5


3RD TM +7         MIKE SILVA                +8          15          0         15

                             RICK WALSH              -1           15          0         15

 (Original 2nd Team has been DQed, although the non-offending partner of the Team will not be penalized.)  


CTP-9TH             Original winner has been DQed.  Sheet not saved to determine next in line. 

 

SKINS                  ANDY PRYLES           1ST       $40       30            10

                             BILL DOONAN            5TH        40       30            10

                             STEVE DANIELI          6TH        40       30            10

(An original skins winner has been DQed.)


HGPTR                MIKE WALL                 20 pts.

(Original Highpointer has been DQed.)


B9 SKINS            BILL DOONAN            15TH        $75     50           25

                              STEVE LOZZI              16TH        $75     50          25

(An original B9 skins winner has been DQed.) 


    


No comments: